Knife edging 16v port divider

Competition engines and 'live' projects only. Good photos to illustrate your post are expected.
Post Reply
Evodelta

Knife edging 16v port divider

Post by Evodelta »

Hello Guy/all,

Do you always knife edge the divider between the inlet ports on a 16v head? Or are there any instances where you wouldn't do this and just leave a smooth radiused edge? How much in the way of gains (if any) are there to be made from this mod or is it just a case of splitting the air cleanly and evenly?

Thanks,
Martin.
Guy Croft
Site Admin
Posts: 5039
Joined: June 18th, 2006, 9:31 am
Location: Bedford, UK
Contact:

Post by Guy Croft »

That section, which I call the splitter, varies in shape from head to head - some like Integrale and Vauxhall XE have a long splitter, dividing the airstream almost at entry, while others like Toyota 16v are very short.

On the longer ones the gain in knife-edging varies from 2-3 cfm to way more than that, but the best gains come only with full reshaping and sometimes shortening (not always at top and bottom), because simply putting a blade-like form on the nose of the splitter can result in an aerofoil 'hump' on the splitter further into the port, so you see there's a lot more involved than just sharpening the thing.


GC
Attachments
Toyota 16v 1600 head showing short splitter compared with Integrale
Toyota 16v 1600 head showing short splitter compared with Integrale
PC Toyota 16v sidedraft port after flowing.jpg (23.84 KiB) Viewed 3661 times
GC Integrale head upside down showing fully developed splitter on a head flowing BPF 162.3cfm at 10".
GC Integrale head upside down showing fully developed splitter on a head flowing BPF 162.3cfm at 10".
MM Int inlet guide intrusion.jpg (452.07 KiB) Viewed 3661 times
Evodelta

Post by Evodelta »

Thanks for the reply, lovely clear shot down the integrale inlet port btw!
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests